Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

Every testing vendor says "AI-powered" now. Fewer of them can show you the actual verification pipeline underneath that claim: what gets checked, what gets trusted without checking, and what happens the moment something breaks. This is that pipeline, as I run it against True Production Insights, formerly known as TrueTest, every time we ship a change to it.

Playwright has gone from a browser automation library most QA teams had never heard of to one of the most-searched testing frameworks in the industry, and interest keeps climbing. If you're evaluating it for your team, comparing it to Selenium or Cypress, or just trying to understand what the interest is about, this guide covers the fundamentals: what Playwright actually is, how it works, what it's used for, and where to go next once you're ready to dig into best practices. THE SHORT ANSWER.

Playwright makes it easy to get a test running quickly. It's harder to keep a whole suite of Playwright tests reliable six months later, once your app has changed, your team has grown, and nobody quite remembers why a particular test is flaky three days a week. If you're new to Playwright, our guide to what Playwright is and how it works is a good place to start first.

Katalon's library of testing skills for AI agents holds 13 skills. Building it produces 124 files. The 13 skills are the actual work: how to plan a test cycle, how to design cases from a requirement, how to read a failing run and decide whether a release is safe. The other 111 files are packaging. Four of them arrived this month and they are the subject of this post.

Most test automation tools are sized for one kind of team. The ones a lean QA group can adopt inside a quarter tend to buckle when a compliance officer asks who approved a change and when. The ones large enterprises standardize on often need a dedicated platform team before anyone writes a single test. Anyone who has evaluated tooling knows the feeling of reading a glowing review and realizing it was written by someone at a company nothing like theirs.

July was an enterprise month. Most of what shipped answers the questions that come up once a test team grows past a handful of people: how do we hand documentation to an auditor, where is the evidence for this step, who changed this result and when, and how do we run the same suite against a feature branch without rebuilding the integration every time.