Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

Modern development strategies rely on continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) to ship high quality software and updates. A well-designed CI/CD pipeline automates key parts of the software development lifecycle so teams can build, test, and deploy changes faster with fewer errors. To achieve this, development teams need the right CI/CD tools. Before you select your CI/CD solutions, you need to understand CI/CD pipelines and how they work.

Quality Assurance (QA) teams must run extensive tests to ensure that a website or application performs as intended before release. However, rather than manually running these tests, which can hinder productivity, modern teams are using QA automation. By automating QA testing workflows, teams can rapidly execute these tests using standardized processes, frameworks, and software. Developers can quickly fix any errors and deliver high-quality code so that product teams can speed up release times.

Cypress and Selenium are two of the most popular website testing tools. Each has advantages, so it can be tough to know which is the best fit for you. That’s why we’ve compared and contrasted the two, so you know which is best for specific use cases. As makers of our own web testing tool, we’re very familiar with what makes one work well. In this article, we’ll give you a complete, unbiased breakdown of Cypress vs Selenium.

You’re searching for “Selenium alternatives” because, while Selenium is a popular open-source test automation tool, it has certain limitations. Its slow execution speed can be problematic when dealing with large test suites or complex applications. The basic reporting and analytics features make finding problems and testing results difficult. It also lacks a mobile app testing focus — an essential feature for most organizations.

Whether you’re new to test automation or you’ve been utilizing it to save time for years, here’s our best advice for maximizing your automation testing productivity and avoiding mistakes. Automated testing entails much more than simply creating tests and enabling them. A “set it and forget it” approach won’t get you very far with automated tests — particularly automated browser tests, which interact with the ever-changing frontend of your application or website.

If you work in QA or have experience in software engineering, it’s likely that you’ve heard the terms “test plan” and “test strategy” used interchangeably. In actuality, they’re quite different, and understanding those differences will help you write clearer documentation, run a tighter team, and ship higher-quality software. This guide breaks down test plan vs test strategy in practical terms, then shows how they fit together on real projects. Ready?

Are you a QA tester grappling with the challenge of making sure geolocation testing is reliable and efficient? If so, then you’re in the right place. Geolocation testing is an important process for anyone dealing with applications or services that rely on location information from users around the world.

What is E2E? E2E is the shorthand term for end-to-end testing. An essential part of the software development process, E2E testing verifies that applications and systems work properly, not only within the test environment, but also in real-life scenarios. It provides a level of assurance that your application will exhibit the correct behavior from start to finish.

Many people don’t test their WordPress websites, and it’s a problem. While the core of WordPress is fairly well-tested by its creators, users, and the open-source community, the same cannot be said for every plugin and theme. There’s an infinite combination of versions, hosting environments, plugins, themes, and configurations. You can’t trust the community to catch every bug that could affect your website.

More than one in four adults in the U.S. has a disability. As the world’s largest minority group, it’s important that businesses design their websites and web apps with inclusivity and ethics in mind. Without proper web accessibility, not only will you alienate a major portion of your potential audience, but you’ll also be exposing your business to major legal risks.