Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

In February, two CNBC journalists built a replica of Monday.com’s interface using Claude Code with no prior developer experience and less than $20 in credits. Software stocks at the time were already wobbly, with investors fearing that AI could erode seat-based pricing and undercut proprietary UI. To some, the CNBC news confirmed the speculation.

In this guest post, Intellyx Principal Analyst Jason English explores what it takes to level up quality engineering in the age of agentic AI, and why visibility, context, and governance are the keys to getting there. One day in an agentic developer’s life: Developer “CodeBud agent, create me a suite of test cases to validate the feature you just built.” CodeBud Done. Test suite created.

As AI-aided software development lifecycles pick up speed, performance teams are left with the familiar challenge of too much work, too few specialists, and results that take too long to analyze. Over the past year, Tricentis NeoLoad has shipped capabilities designed to address each of these problems directly. What started with Augmented Analysis accelerating root cause identification grew into a fully connected Model Context Protocol (MCP) architecture.

State and local governments are under growing pressure to modernize the systems that power essential services, from healthcare and human services to transportation and public safety. At the same time, citizens expect fast, seamless digital experiences when interacting with government agencies. To meet these expectations, many agencies are investing in large-scale ERP transformations, including SAP and Oracle migrations.

We surveyed 2,501 IT decision-makers, QA professionals, and business leaders across six countries for our second annual Quality Transformation Report. Respondents came from organizations with 150-plus employees across manufacturing, energy and utilities, retail, financial services, and the public sector. One of the major findings: confidence in AI agents making release decisions dropped from 48% in 2025 to 34% in 2026. That’s a 14-point decline in a single year.

The 2027 S/4HANA deadline still looms large in the minds of SAP customers, but at this year’s SAP Sapphire event, SAP worked to move the conversation beyond cloud migration alone. Instead, they introduced a broader redefinition of what it means to be an “Autonomous Enterprise.” At the center of this new Autonomous Enterprise strategy is agentic AI. SAP envisions the future enterprise as one that can leverage its business data to power agents across its ERP applications.

Not long ago, the answer to who writes tests was simple: the quality assurance (QA) engineer does. They sat downstream of development, received a build, and translated requirements into scripts. It was a defined role with a defined output. That clarity is gone. In 2026, the person or system responsible for test creation might be a business analyst (BA) mapping out a customer journey, an AI agent expanding test coverage overnight, or a QA engineer who hasn’t written a traditional script in months.

Quick summary: AI is creating anxiety and excitement — teams can get more work done faster, but does all this automation leave the worker behind? Not necessarily, says one performance engineering leader. The AI revolution, he says, is another technological wave. To ride it, performance engineers must embrace the change.