Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

‍ Picture this: you finish your morning run, your smartwatch buzzes, and within seconds your phone shows your heart rate, pace, calories, and recovery time, all in one dashboard. That smooth, data-rich experience? It’s powered by apps like Garmin Connect, which have redefined how millions track and improve their fitness.

Automation has always been at the heart of efficient testing. It speeds up validation, eliminates repetitive steps, and helps teams catch issues earlier. However, even with great automation frameworks in place, one challenge persists: how to quickly and accurately convert manual tests into automated scripts? For most teams, this process still requires time, technical skill, and lots of rewriting.

In today's hyper-competitive digital world, software is no longer a basic, single thing. We live in a world with distributed architectures, microservices, cloud-native environments, and complicated API ecosystems. This complexity has changed how we produce things, but it has also broken down conventional, walled-off ways of ensuring quality, pushing the boundaries of traditional software testing services.

TL;DR: Claude Code writes features fast, but you need integration tests. With proxymock MCP, Claude Code can pull real production traffic and validate your changes automatically—one prompt, no manual setup. Watch it catch bugs before production.

Every year, KubeCon offers a candid look at where the cloud-native community stands — the tools gaining traction, the pain points teams share, and the big gaps still holding organizations back. After a week of deep conversations, session hopping, and talking to dozens of platform teams, one theme became impossible to ignore: Platform engineering still isn’t doing enough testing. And even more surprising: many teams don’t think testing is their responsibility.

If you’ve worked in QA long enough, you’ve seen how much testing has changed inside Jira. What started as a mix of spreadsheets, manual checklists, and endless review cycles has grown into fully integrated Test Management workflows. But even with automation, some challenges never went away. Writing test cases from requirements still takes time.

Testing is a very important and necessary step in the SDLC, but most teams ignore it or don’t care much about it, while some teams spend most of their time on testing instead of building features. AI is really changing the way we write code, but most people use it mainly for writing test cases, and we still end up doing it manually. So in this blog, let’s see what AI testing is, how AI helps in testing our software, what AI tools are available, and which tools help with which part of testing.

‍ Healthcare isn’t short on data; it’s short on usable insight. Hospitals generate an enormous share of global data, and about 30% of the world’s data now comes from healthcare, growing at one of the fastest rates across industries (RBC Capital Markets). Yet an estimated 97% of health data still goes unused for care and operations (World Economic Forum).

When we first published this report last year, AI in software testing was still an experiment for most teams. Since then, well… everything has changed. In 2025, AI hasn’t been a promise of what’s to come — it’s become an everyday reality.

It’s a common idea across the tech industry: AI is fueling a new wave of technological innovation. Test automation is no exception. Over three decades, enterprise QA customers have turned to Tricentis Tosca to transform inefficient testing practices with model-based automation. Now, the company you’ve relied on for scalable, codeless test automation is entering a new era of agentic testing with Tosca’s cloud deployment as its foundation.