Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

At its simplest, AI debugging automates repetitive coding tasks like searching logs, reading stack traces and comparing sessions. But good AI debugging is a much more challenging concept that relies on focused context, runtime evidence and structured investigation paths. In this post we’ll show you how to debug with AI, not just productively but also responsibly. Let’s get into it.

When was the last time you made a major business decision and were completely certain the data behind it was accurate, complete, and trusted? For most organizations, that certainty is less common than it should be. Qlik and Amazon Quick together solve one of the biggest obstacles to AI adoption: knowing whether you can trust the output.

Clinical documentation has become one of the biggest sources of administrative burden in healthcare. Physicians spend hours every week creating notes, updating EHRs, and completing after hours charting. As a result, healthcare organizations are increasingly investing in ambient clinical documentation solutions that can capture conversations, generate notes, and reduce manual documentation work.

Recently someone on our team opened a traffic snapshot and found an HTTP request that was captured with our eBPF capture agent, nettap. Our protocol dissector parsed most of the response correctly, but that correctness ended once the response headers were processed. What they ended up with was a recording of an HTTP request/response where the response body was just an incorrect collection of garbage binary data when it should have been JSON text.

When the Open Semantic Interchange (OSI) initiative launched last year, it set out to solve a problem every data leader recognizes: the same business metric gets defined a dozen different ways across a company's BI tools, warehouses, and now, AI agents. "Monthly active users" in the CRM rarely matches "monthly active users" in the warehouse, and every new AI copilot added to the stack makes the gap more visible, not less. That initiative has just taken its most consequential step yet.

Leadership has visibility into more AI-generated code than ever. But seeing it and trusting it are two separate things.

Everyone can build an AI agent today. The hard part isn't getting an agent to answer a question or complete a demo. It's deploying one that employees trust, security teams approve, and operations teams can manage at scale. That's where many AI projects stall. As organizations move beyond experimentation, the conversation shifts from prompt engineering to production readiness. Can the agent safely access business data? Can you evaluate changes before deployment? Can you understand why it made a decision?

In 2026, asking a BI tool, “What happened to revenue last quarter?” feels almost effortless. That ease is the appeal of conversational analytics. It turns plain language into charts, metrics, and short explanations. It sits inside the broader world of augmented analytics, where AI helps people ask better questions and move faster. But speed can hide problems. If the metric is vague, the calendar is wrong, or access rules are loose, a fast answer can still be the wrong answer.

Teams have more dashboards than ever. They also have more dashboard fatigue. Metrics are easy to display. Decisions are harder. A chart can show a drop in revenue, but it rarely tells a product leader what to do next. That gap is why many teams stay stuck in review mode instead of action mode. This is where decision-centric analytics changes the pattern. The goal is not more visibility. The goal is faster recognition, better understanding, and clear follow-through when something changes.

Enterprise AI is moving beyond experimentation. Today, the real challenge is not building machine learning models but operationalizing them at scale through reliable training, deployment, monitoring, governance, and continuous improvement. This shift is accelerating rapidly. Gartner reports that organizations with high AI maturity are more than twice as likely to keep AI initiatives operational for three years or more, underscoring the growing importance of robust MLOps practices.