Systems | Development | Analytics | API | Testing

With the rise of AI use in vehicle software development, concerns arise around its presence in safety-critical applications, especially when it comes to functional safety and regulatory compliance. ISO 26262, the essential standard for automotive development that requires processes for managing, designing, and verifying safety-critical systems, still applies. However, it can fall short when applied to AI models, which are inherently non-deterministic and continuously evolving.

Every enterprise moving AI into production is about to face a familiar problem in an unfamiliar form: the cost explosion, but for LLMs. This is *very *similar to what happened with cloud. In the early days of cloud, teams spun up infrastructure with no visibility into who was consuming what. Finance got the bill. Engineering got the blame. No one had the data to make good decisions. It took years of hard-won FinOps discipline to fix that. LLM spend is on the same trajectory *and moving faster*.

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is quickly becoming the standard for how large language models connect to enterprise data. As adoption accelerates, engineering teams face a foundational decision: build a custom MCP server from scratch, or adopt an AI data gateway that ships with MCP support, security, and governance out of the box. Both paths have real tradeoffs. This post breaks them down so you can make the right call for your stack, your team, and your risk profile.

Audit logs are essential for making AI systems accountable, reliable, and compliant with regulations. They act as a record-keeping system, documenting every critical interaction within an AI system, such as user prompts, model decisions, and policy enforcement. Here's why they are crucial: Audit logs are not just a legal requirement - they are a key part of managing AI systems effectively and minimizing risks.

AI workflows for manufacturing need to be deployed quickly. Quality control systems, predictive maintenance tools, and supply chain optimization algorithms may be going live, yet compliance infrastructure is lagging behind. The result is a familiar pattern: pilots that prove out technically but stall before production because they can’t clear audit, safety, or regulatory review.

Insurtech is picking up pace fast. And it’s not only because of new tech coming in, but also because people today simply expect things to be easier, quicker, and more transparent. That said, technology is still doing most of the heavy lifting here. We’re already used to apps simplifying our everyday lives, so when insurance starts doing the same, it naturally feels like the right move.‍ So, what is Insurtech? And why is it expected to reach $152.4 billion by 2030?

There is a scenario playing out in QA teams everywhere right now. A team adopts an AI testing tool, runs it for the first time, and gets 300 test cases in minutes. The demo worked. The ROI math looked great. But three sprints later, 60 of those test cases are validating requirements that were updated in the last sprint. Twenty more test a user flow that was deprecated. The AI performed exactly as advertised. The governance system never existed.